The genesis of "Litigiousnesses" isn’t a singular event, but a cascading series of accretions, much like the sedimentary layers of a forgotten continent. We begin, inevitably, with the Dissolution – the shattering of the Unified Narrative. This wasn't a conscious act, of course. It was a slow erosion, a gradual decoupling of belief systems from their underlying realities. Think of it as the slow drip of water carving a canyon, not a sudden, violent upheaval.
Note: The term "Unified Narrative" is itself a loaded construct, reflecting the inherent desire for coherence in the face of chaos.
Litigiousnesses aren't simply disagreements; they're fundamentally different modes of being. They represent a shift from a linear, causal understanding of the world to a simultaneous awareness of multiple, often contradictory, realities. Consider the concept of ‘causality’ itself – a construct designed to impose order onto a fundamentally chaotic system. Within a Litigiousness, causality becomes a shimmering surface, reflecting a multitude of potential outcomes, each equally valid within its own context.
The visual representation of a Litigiousness mirrors its complex structure. Imagine a landscape composed of overlapping planes, each representing a different reality, constantly shifting and reforming in response to observation and interaction. The further one ventures into the core of a Litigiousness, the more fragmented and unstable the landscape becomes, until finally, it dissolves into a sea of pure potential.
We can begin to categorize Litigiousnesses based on their primary characteristics. However, such categorizations are inherently provisional, subject to revision as new information emerges and the landscape of Divergent Realities continues to evolve.
Further research is, of course, ongoing. The mapping of Litigiousnesses is not a static endeavor; it’s a perpetual act of discovery, a constant negotiation between observation and interpretation. The very act of attempting to define them contributes to their proliferation.